The one being penetrated may be referred to as the bottom or passive partner. ĭuring anal sex, the insertive partner may be referred to as the top or active partner. Other men who have sex with men associate male masculinity with the sexual positions of "tops" and "bottoms" during anal sex. Some frot advocates consider "two genitals coming together by mingling, caressing, sliding" and rubbing to be sex more than other forms of male sexual activity. This preference has led to some debate in the gay male and MSM community regarding what constitutes "real sex" or the most sensual expression of sexual intimacy. Some gay men, or men who have sex with men (MSM) in general, prefer to engage in frot or other forms of mutual masturbation because they find it more pleasurable or more affectionate than anal sex, to preserve technical virginity, or as safe sex alternatives to anal penetration. Vaccines are available against HPV.Ĭomparison with anal sex and debates However, frot can still transmit other sexually transmitted infections, such as HPV (which can cause genital warts) and pubic lice (crabs). HIV is among the infections that require such direct contact, and research indicates that there is no risk of HIV transmission via frot. Since frot is a non-penetrative sex act, the risk of passing a sexually transmitted infection (STI/STD) that requires direct contact between the mucous membranes and pre-ejaculate or semen is reduced. See also: Gay sexual practices General įrot can be enjoyable because it mutually and simultaneously stimulates the genitals of both partners as it tends to produce pleasurable friction against the frenulum nerve bundle on the underside of each man's penile shaft, just below the urinary opening (meatus) of the penis head (glans penis). The female version of frotting is called tribbing, which also means "rubbing " and is derived from Greek. Īlternative terms for frot include frictation, which can refer to the wider meaning of frottage but also penis-penis sex specifically, as well as sword-fighting, Oxford style, Princeton rub, and Ivy League rub. "Frot, by contrast, is always phallus-to-phallus sex." Weintraub believes that is what actual sex is – genital-genital contact. "I don't use the word 'frottage,' because it is an ersatz French word which can indicate any sort of erotic rubbing," he stated.
![public gay cum facials sex public gay cum facials sex](https://www.gayck.com/contents/videos_screenshots/55000/55521/preview.jpg)
Gay activist Bill Weintraub began to heavily promote and recommend the gender-specific meaning of "penis-to-penis rubbing" as frot on Internet forums sometime in the late 1990s, and said he coined the term. One view argued that the popularity of anal sex would decline, presumably with a corresponding drop in HIV rates, if gay men could somehow be persuaded to stop thinking of anal sex as a " vanilla" practice, but rather as something "kinky" and not-quite-respectable-as was the case in the 1950s and 1960s, when gay men who preferred to do only mutual masturbation and fellatio sometimes used the disparaging slang term brownie queen for aficionados of anal sex. The modern definition of frot emerged in a context of a debate about the status of anal sex within the gay male community some in the anti-anal, pro-frot camp insist that anal sex ought to be avoided altogether.
![public gay cum facials sex public gay cum facials sex](http://th7.dirtypornvids.com/th/gsD/97714566.jpg)
Their commitment to safe sex may not necessarily be compromised by their practice of cum play, but the extent to which this could represent a risk for HIV transmission depends on the reliability of their assessment of their partners' HIV serostatus. Many feel confident in their knowledge of their partner's HIV serostatus and only use condoms with these partners at their partner's request.
![public gay cum facials sex public gay cum facials sex](http://th1.dirtypornvids.com/th/p8J/119251024.jpg)
"Safe sex" for some gay and bisexual men does not necessarily mean consistent commitment to condom use or to avoiding semen exchange. Cum play was not uncommon and highlights the narrowness (or danger) of focusing on condom use without considering the implications of broader sexual practices and their meaning for sexual health promotion. They were also generally more optimistic about the likelihood of HIV transmission, and they often only used condoms at their partners' instigation. HIV-negative men who engaged in receptive cum play during PAIC often believed that their partner was HIV seroconcordant and tended to trust that partner.
![public gay cum facials sex public gay cum facials sex](https://bs3.qvcdn.com/enhanced-2/0f2/3e5/0f23e55c255d1b244258c163558575a2.jpg)
Receptive cum play (partner ejaculating or rubbing his semen over participant's anus, or participant using partner's semen as lubricant) was reported by one in six HIV-negative and one quarter of HIV-positive men on the same occasion of protected anal intercourse with a casual partner (PAIC). We investigated the prevalence of "cum play" and its context among 1153 HIV-negative and 147 HIV-positive Australian gay men in an online survey. The exchange of semen, often referred to as "cum play," has featured in gay literature and may be a unique aspect of many gay men's sexual behavior.